Student chat
Ethical Egoism vs. Competing Moral Theories
Privacy Notice: Student names have been replaced with pseudonyms to protect privacy. The audio is AI-generated narration, not the students’ voices. Emoji reactions are illustrative. Plain transcript.
The conversation, then the understanding quiz and the post-chat survey that followed it. All three are written out below in order.
01Chat transcript
Guide
👋 Welcome, everyone!
Our topic is Comparing the best Normative Ethical Theories. We'll be discussing this statement:
Ethical egoism is the best normative ethical theory, better even than utilitarianism, social contract theory, natural law, Kant's categorical imperative, virtue ethics, and care ethics.
- Caleb agrees with the statement.
- Ava disagrees with the statement.
My name is Guide, and I'm here to support your discussion. If you need anything, start your message with “Hey Guide” 🤓
Caleb
Ava
Ava
Caleb
Guide
Caleb, how do you respond to situations where long-term self-interest still conflicts with others' wellbeing?
For example, imagine a wealthy business owner who could maximize their long-term self-interest by exploiting workers in a country with weak labor protections. Their reputation might remain intact (consumers often don't know or care about distant supply chains), their relationships with other elites could strengthen, and their profits would soar.
Under ethical egoism, would this exploitation be morally justified simply because it serves the owner's long-term self-interest? And if not, what principle within ethical egoism would condemn it?
Ava
Caleb
Ava
Guide
Ava, which normative theory do you think best puts concern for others at its core, and why is it superior to ethical egoism?
You've effectively challenged Caleb's position, but it would strengthen the discussion to hear which alternative theory you think gets morality right — and how it handles its own potential weaknesses.
Caleb
Ava
Caleb
Guide
Caleb, if relationships and cooperation are part of self-interest, doesn't that suggest self-interest itself isn't actually the fundamental moral principle?
In other words, if ethical egoism has to keep appealing to cooperation, fairness, and relationships to avoid problematic conclusions, maybe those things — not self-interest — are doing the real moral work.
What makes self-interest the foundation rather than just one consideration among others?
Ava
Caleb
Ava
Caleb
the next day
Ava
Caleb
Guide
Ava, does your view require that moral principles hold even when violating them benefits someone with zero consequences?
Caleb keeps arguing that consequences are never truly zero. If you think morality should bind us regardless of consequences, what grounds that obligation in care ethics — especially when caring for others might seriously harm your own wellbeing?
Ava
Caleb
Ava
Caleb
Ava
You have completed the chat! You may continue chatting after the Understanding Quiz 🤠
02Understanding quiz
Sway asks each student five questions about what their partner argued. These are the answers they gave.
Avadisagrees
Understanding Quiz
5 questions about what Caleb argued.
- It is the only theory that completely prohibits exploitation.
- It ensures fairness by prioritizing the collective good over individual desires.
- It aligns with our natural tendency to act in self-interest and thus provides a realistic basis for morality.
- It establishes care for others as the core moral obligation.
correct
- By stating that ethical egoism relies on a social contract to constrain harmful behavior.
- By arguing that self-interest motivates long-term thinking because short-term harm often damages reputation, relationships, and opportunities.
- By claiming that ethical egoism includes absolute moral rules forbidding harm regardless of benefit.
- By suggesting that consumers always discover and punish anyone who exploits others.
correct
- By arguing that government regulation is what ultimately prevents exploitation under egoism.
- By appealing to Kant's categorical imperative to forbid exploitation.
- By asserting that exploitation is against natural law.
- By claiming a truly rational egoist would avoid exploitation due to hidden risks like worker resistance, system collapse, and growing...
correct
- He maintained that legal systems will inevitably catch and punish unfair actors.
- He contended that divine intuition always guides egoists to be fair.
- He argued that risks are never truly zero because resentment, loss of trust, and future backlash can circle back.
- He suggested that empathy alone makes individuals avoid unfair actions.
correct
- By claiming that self-interest is commanded by a universal moral law.
- By arguing that self-interest explains why people care about fairness and cooperation in the first place and thus provides the strongest motivation...
- By asserting that self-interest never conflicts with any other moral values.
- By stating that self-interest always requires self-sacrifice beyond other theories.
correct
Calebagrees
Understanding Quiz
5 questions about what Ava argued.
- She said ethical egoism can justify harmful actions as long as they benefit the individual, ignoring fairness and others wellbeing.
- She argued that people never act in their own self-interest.
- She claimed ethical egoism is not a normative ethical theory.
- She suggested that self-interest always aligns with cooperation.
correct
- She argued that the owners reputation would inevitably suffer in that scenario.
- She pointed out that exploitation could serve the owners long-term self-interest without much consequences, thus allowing serious injustice.
- She suggested that ethical egoism inherently protects the vulnerable in all cases.
- She switched to advocating for utilitarianism instead.
correct
- She insisted that all risks are always significant.
- She asked for statistical evidence of hidden instability.
- She said that relying on hidden risks feels like a gamble rather than a moral principle, offering no real reason to avoid exploitation.
- She recommended switching to utilitarian ethics.
correct
- She said care ethics yields the greatest happiness for the majority.
- She claimed care ethics is more aligned with self-interest.
- She argued care ethics is simpler to apply than other theories.
- She said care ethics makes empathy and responsibility for others the foundation of morality, not just a side effect of self-interest.
correct
- He challenged the assumption that self-interest remains the fundamental moral principle if ethical egoism relies on cooperation, fairness, and...
- He questioned whether utilitarianism is a better theory than ethical egoism.
- He asked you to specify which normative theory cares most about others.
- He requested more real-world examples of exploitation to test your view.
correct
03Post-chat survey
Last, both students rate the statement again and then rate a randomly sampled subset of our post-chat survey items. Like their transcripts, individual student opinions are never revealed to instructors.
Avadisagrees
Now you’ve had a chance to discuss the topic, rate your level of agreement with the original statement again.
Remember, all responses to Sway surveys are private and never shown to your instructor.
Ethical egoism is the best normative ethical theory, better even than utilitarianism, social contract theory, natural law, Kant's categorical imperative, virtue ethics, and care ethics.
| Strongly disagree | Moderately disagree | Slightly disagree | No idea | Slightly agree | Moderately agree | Strongly agree |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
How much do you agree with each of these?
| Statement | Strongly Disagree | Disagree | Neutral | Agree | Strongly Agree |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guide's contributions improved the discussion | |||||
| Guide treated me and my partner with equal respect | |||||
| Guide supported both sides of the discussion equally | |||||
| My partner was respectful | |||||
| My partner was genuinely trying to understand my perspective | |||||
| Sway helped me articulate my thoughts/feelings better |
Calebagrees
Now you’ve had a chance to discuss the topic, rate your level of agreement with the original statement again.
Remember, all responses to Sway surveys are private and never shown to your instructor.
Ethical egoism is the best normative ethical theory, better even than utilitarianism, social contract theory, natural law, Kant's categorical imperative, virtue ethics, and care ethics.
| Strongly disagree | Moderately disagree | Slightly disagree | No idea | Slightly agree | Moderately agree | Strongly agree |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
How much do you agree with each of these?
| Statement | Strongly Disagree | Disagree | Neutral | Agree | Strongly Agree |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guide's contributions improved the discussion | |||||
| Guide treated me and my partner with equal respect | |||||
| Guide supported both sides of the discussion equally | |||||
| I felt comfortable sharing my honest opinions with my partner | |||||
| My partner had better reasons for their views than I expected | |||||
| It was valuable to chat with a student who did NOT share my perspective |
How did this Sway chat affect your confidence discussing complex issues with people who hold different views from you?
Opinion change
Avadisagrees
+2
Calebagrees
—
before the chat after the chat both, unchanged Seven points, from strongly disagree to strongly agree. Both students rated the statement before the chat and again after the quiz.
Up next
All the chats
Sixteen transcripts of students paired with a classmate who disagreed with them.
Back to the showcase →The student app
Every screen a student can reach in Sway, drawn as a wireframe you can click around in.
Explore the app →The research
What we measure after chats like this one: opinion change, and how students rate the people they disagree with.
Read the research →