Want to use Sway with your students?

Student chat

Ethical Egoism vs. Competing Moral Theories

Privacy Notice: Student names have been replaced with pseudonyms to protect privacy. The audio is AI-generated narration, not the students’ voices. Emoji reactions are illustrative. Plain transcript.

The conversation, then the understanding quiz and the post-chat survey that followed it. All three are written out below in order.

01Chat transcript

ethical egoism vs. competing moral theories
0:00
——

Guide

👋 Welcome, everyone!

Our topic is Comparing the best Normative Ethical Theories. We'll be discussing this statement:

Ethical egoism is the best normative ethical theory, better even than utilitarianism, social contract theory, natural law, Kant's categorical imperative, virtue ethics, and care ethics.

  • Caleb agrees with the statement.
  • Ava disagrees with the statement.

My name is Guide, and I'm here to support your discussion. If you need anything, start your message with “Hey Guide” 🤓

Caleb

I believe ethical egoism is the best normative ethical theory because its practical and realistic . At the end of the day ,people naturally act in their own self interest instead of pretending otherwise, ethical egoism make that the foundation of morality

Ava

I see your point, however👍

Ava

Ethical egoism can justify harmful actions as long as they benefit the individual, which ignores fairness and the wellbeing of others.

Caleb

I get concern, but i think ethical egoism actually encourages long-term thinking. hurting other might give short-short benefit but in the long run it usually damage your reputation relationship and even opportunities, so real self-interest actually keep s harmful in check

Guide

Caleb, how do you respond to situations where long-term self-interest still conflicts with others' wellbeing?

For example, imagine a wealthy business owner who could maximize their long-term self-interest by exploiting workers in a country with weak labor protections. Their reputation might remain intact (consumers often don't know or care about distant supply chains), their relationships with other elites could strengthen, and their profits would soar.

Under ethical egoism, would this exploitation be morally justified simply because it serves the owner's long-term self-interest? And if not, what principle within ethical egoism would condemn it?

Ava

Guide brings up a good point, and this is where I think ethical egoism falls short. In your business owners case, exploitation could very well serve the owner’s long-term self-interest without much consequences. If ethical egoism says that’s morally acceptable, then it seems to allow serious injustice as long as it benefits the individual. Ethical egoism doesn’t provide a way to protect the vulnerable when their wellbeing clashes with someone else’s interests. Thats why I don’t think it works as a foundation for morality.

Caleb

I get that but I'd argue a truly rational egoist wouldn't rely on exploitation .even if it seem beneficial short term it create hidden risk-worker can resist system can collapse, and transparency keeps growing. Ethical egoism isn't about reckless selfishness it's about pursuing stable, lasting self interest, which usually means cooperation and fairness are smarter than exploitation.

Ava

makes sense, and I get that ethical egoism doesn’t have to mean reckless selfishness. But my concern is that the theory relies too heavily on the assumption that fairness and cooperation will always align with self-interest. History shows plenty of cases where exploitation has worked out for individuals or groups without collapsing or being resisted. If morality is only grounded in what’s best for “me”, there’s still no real safeguard against injustice when harming others does pay off. Thats why I think a moral theory should put concern for others at its core, not just as a by-product of self interest.

Guide

Ava, which normative theory do you think best puts concern for others at its core, and why is it superior to ethical egoism?

You've effectively challenged Caleb's position, but it would strengthen the discussion to hear which alternative theory you think gets morality right — and how it handles its own potential weaknesses.

Caleb

I get that but other theories have the same problem for example ,utilitarianism could justify sacrificing one person for the majority ethical egoism is clearer-long term self-interest usually pushes us toward fairness and cooperation

Ava

Thats true Caleb, no theory is perfect. But I think in this case care ethics does better than egoism because it makes empathy and responsibility for others the foundation of morality, not just a side effect of self-interest. While utilitarianism can sacrifice the few for the many, and egoism can ignore others if it benefits “me”, care ethics insists that relationships and people’s actual needs matter first. Its weakness is that it can be too focused on those closest to us, but even so, it provides a stronger safeguard against exploitation and injustice than egoism does.

Caleb

I see why you value care ethics but I think egoism still work better in practice. relationship and cooperation are part of real self-interest so it naturally pushes people to avoid harming other -even if that's not the main focus

Guide

Caleb, if relationships and cooperation are part of self-interest, doesn't that suggest self-interest itself isn't actually the fundamental moral principle?

In other words, if ethical egoism has to keep appealing to cooperation, fairness, and relationships to avoid problematic conclusions, maybe those things — not self-interest — are doing the real moral work.

What makes self-interest the foundation rather than just one consideration among others?

Ava

If ethical egoism only avoids injustice by leaning on things like fairness, cooperation, and healthy relationships, then it seems like those values, not self-interest are what’s actually carrying the moral weight. Self-interest may motivate people, but that doesn’t mean it should define morality. A good moral theory should put those values at the center, rather than treating them as useful side effects of looking out for ourselves.

Caleb

I get that, but I'd say self-interest is still a foundation because it explains why people care about fairness and cooperation in the first place. Those values matter because they serve our well-being and survival. without self-interest, there's no strong reason to follow them consistently

Ava

understandable but I think that makes morality too conditional. If fairness and cooperation only matter because they serve my wellbeing, then the moment they don’t, I lose the reason to uphold them. Thats why I don’t see self-interest as a solid foundation for morality, it makes values like justice and care optional. A stronger theory would treat those values as binding in themselves, not just when they benefit us.

Caleb

That's a fair challenge, but I'd say even when it looks like someone can get away with unfairness, risks are never truly zero. exploiting others creates hidden instability -resentment, loss of trust, or future blacklash-that can circle back. Ethical egoism sees fairness not as optional but as the safest long-term strategy for protecting your own interests

the next day

Ava

I get what you’re saying, but that feels like it leans on a gamble rather than a moral principle. If someone’s clever enough to avoid backlash completely, egoism gives them no real reason not to exploit others. That makes “fairness” feel more like a strategy of convenience than a genuine value. Doesn’t that weaken the idea that egoism can ground morality, since it only works as long as it lines up with self-interest?

Caleb

Fairness isn’t just convenience - in real life no one can fully escape the risk of broken trust egoism show it smartest long term strategy for protecting yourself

Guide

Ava, does your view require that moral principles hold even when violating them benefits someone with zero consequences?

Caleb keeps arguing that consequences are never truly zero. If you think morality should bind us regardless of consequences, what grounds that obligation in care ethics — especially when caring for others might seriously harm your own wellbeing?

Ava

I’d say care ethics grounds obligation not in consequence but in the reality of our relationships, we’re not isolated individuals, we’re deeply interdependent. Even if I could “get away with it” , turning my back on care erodes the very connections that give my life meaning. Yes, caring can cost me, but those responsibilities aren’t just optional tradeoffs , they’re part of what it means to live as a person in community.

Caleb

I get that but if caring stopped giving you meaning or even harmed your survival , why would it still bind you? egoism ties value to wellbeing , not beyond it

Ava

I hear you, but thats where we differ, care ethics doesn’t make meaning conditional on payoff. Even if caring is hard or costly, it still binds because relationships aren’t just tools for survival, they’re part of who we are. If I only cared when it suited me, that wouldn’t really be care at all, it would be self interest in disguise.

Caleb

i get that but if care binds even when it harms you, doesn't that make morality endless self-sacrifice?

Ava

not really. Care ethics aren’t about throwing yourself away, it’s about balance and responsiveness in relationships. Sometimes that means sacrifice, but not endlessly, genuine care also includes caring for yourself, because you’re part of the web of relationships too. The difference is that morality isn’t reduced to survival math, its about sustaining the connections that makes life meaningful for everyone involved.

02Understanding quiz

Sway asks each student five questions about what their partner argued. These are the answers they gave.

Avadisagrees

Understanding Quiz

5 questions about what Caleb argued.

At the beginning of the discussion, you argued that ethical egoism is the best normative ethical theory because:
  • It is the only theory that completely prohibits exploitation.
  • It ensures fairness by prioritizing the collective good over individual desires.
  • It aligns with our natural tendency to act in self-interest and thus provides a realistic basis for morality.
  • It establishes care for others as the core moral obligation.

correct

When you objected that ethical egoism could justify harmful actions if they benefit an individual, how did Caleb respond?
  • By stating that ethical egoism relies on a social contract to constrain harmful behavior.
  • By arguing that self-interest motivates long-term thinking because short-term harm often damages reputation, relationships, and opportunities.
  • By claiming that ethical egoism includes absolute moral rules forbidding harm regardless of benefit.
  • By suggesting that consumers always discover and punish anyone who exploits others.

correct

Guide presented a scenario where a business owner could exploit workers with no apparent long-term consequences. How did Caleb argue that ethical egoism would still condemn such exploitation?
  • By arguing that government regulation is what ultimately prevents exploitation under egoism.
  • By appealing to Kant's categorical imperative to forbid exploitation.
  • By asserting that exploitation is against natural law.
  • By claiming a truly rational egoist would avoid exploitation due to hidden risks like worker resistance, system collapse, and growing...

correct

Towards the end, when asked what stops someone from acting unfairly if they can get away with it, what reasoning did Caleb present to maintain the importance of fairness under ethical egoism?
  • He maintained that legal systems will inevitably catch and punish unfair actors.
  • He contended that divine intuition always guides egoists to be fair.
  • He argued that risks are never truly zero because resentment, loss of trust, and future backlash can circle back.
  • He suggested that empathy alone makes individuals avoid unfair actions.

correct

In response to Guide's challenge that appealing to cooperation and fairness might mean those values, not self-interest, are the real moral work, how did Caleb defend self-interest as the fundamental moral principle?
  • By claiming that self-interest is commanded by a universal moral law.
  • By arguing that self-interest explains why people care about fairness and cooperation in the first place and thus provides the strongest motivation...
  • By asserting that self-interest never conflicts with any other moral values.
  • By stating that self-interest always requires self-sacrifice beyond other theories.

correct

5 of 5 correct Next

Calebagrees

Understanding Quiz

5 questions about what Ava argued.

Early in the discussion, you argued that ethical egoisms realism is its strength. How did Ava first challenge that claim?
  • She said ethical egoism can justify harmful actions as long as they benefit the individual, ignoring fairness and others wellbeing.
  • She argued that people never act in their own self-interest.
  • She claimed ethical egoism is not a normative ethical theory.
  • She suggested that self-interest always aligns with cooperation.

correct

When Guide introduced the example of a wealthy business owner exploiting workers, how did Ava use that scenario to reinforce her critique of ethical egoism?
  • She argued that the owners reputation would inevitably suffer in that scenario.
  • She pointed out that exploitation could serve the owners long-term self-interest without much consequences, thus allowing serious injustice.
  • She suggested that ethical egoism inherently protects the vulnerable in all cases.
  • She switched to advocating for utilitarianism instead.

correct

After you argued that risks from exploitation are never truly zero, how did Ava respond?
  • She insisted that all risks are always significant.
  • She asked for statistical evidence of hidden instability.
  • She said that relying on hidden risks feels like a gamble rather than a moral principle, offering no real reason to avoid exploitation.
  • She recommended switching to utilitarian ethics.

correct

When you asked Ava which normative theory she prefers over ethical egoism, what reason did she give for endorsing care ethics?
  • She said care ethics yields the greatest happiness for the majority.
  • She claimed care ethics is more aligned with self-interest.
  • She argued care ethics is simpler to apply than other theories.
  • She said care ethics makes empathy and responsibility for others the foundation of morality, not just a side effect of self-interest.

correct

How did Guide challenge your claim that relationships and cooperation naturally support ethical egoisms foundation?
  • He challenged the assumption that self-interest remains the fundamental moral principle if ethical egoism relies on cooperation, fairness, and...
  • He questioned whether utilitarianism is a better theory than ethical egoism.
  • He asked you to specify which normative theory cares most about others.
  • He requested more real-world examples of exploitation to test your view.

correct

5 of 5 correct Next

03Post-chat survey

Last, both students rate the statement again and then rate a randomly sampled subset of our post-chat survey items. Like their transcripts, individual student opinions are never revealed to instructors.

Avadisagrees

Now you’ve had a chance to discuss the topic, rate your level of agreement with the original statement again.

Remember, all responses to Sway surveys are private and never shown to your instructor.

Ethical egoism is the best normative ethical theory, better even than utilitarianism, social contract theory, natural law, Kant's categorical imperative, virtue ethics, and care ethics.

Strongly disagreeModerately disagreeSlightly disagreeNo ideaSlightly agreeModerately agreeStrongly agree

How much do you agree with each of these?

StatementStrongly DisagreeDisagreeNeutralAgreeStrongly Agree
Guide's contributions improved the discussion
Guide treated me and my partner with equal respect
Guide supported both sides of the discussion equally
My partner was respectful
My partner was genuinely trying to understand my perspective
Sway helped me articulate my thoughts/feelings better
Submit

Calebagrees

Now you’ve had a chance to discuss the topic, rate your level of agreement with the original statement again.

Remember, all responses to Sway surveys are private and never shown to your instructor.

Ethical egoism is the best normative ethical theory, better even than utilitarianism, social contract theory, natural law, Kant's categorical imperative, virtue ethics, and care ethics.

Strongly disagreeModerately disagreeSlightly disagreeNo ideaSlightly agreeModerately agreeStrongly agree

How much do you agree with each of these?

StatementStrongly DisagreeDisagreeNeutralAgreeStrongly Agree
Guide's contributions improved the discussion
Guide treated me and my partner with equal respect
Guide supported both sides of the discussion equally
I felt comfortable sharing my honest opinions with my partner
My partner had better reasons for their views than I expected
It was valuable to chat with a student who did NOT share my perspective

How did this Sway chat affect your confidence discussing complex issues with people who hold different views from you?

It definitely increased my confidence. Hearing Ava’s challenges helped me think more critically about my own arguments and express them more clearly. I feel more prepared now to have respectful discussions on difficult topics with people who disagree with me.
Submit

Opinion change

Avadisagrees

+2

Calebagrees

before the chat after the chat both, unchanged Seven points, from strongly disagree to strongly agree. Both students rated the statement before the chat and again after the quiz.

Up next