Want to use Sway with your students?

Student chat

Gender Inequality in America

Privacy Notice: Student names have been replaced with pseudonyms to protect privacy. The audio is AI-generated narration, not the students’ voices. Emoji reactions are illustrative. Plain transcript.

The conversation, then the understanding quiz and the post-chat survey that followed it. All three are written out below in order.

01Chat transcript

gender inequality in america
0:00
——

Guide

👋 Welcome, everyone!

Our topic is gender inequality. We'll be discussing this statement:

Women were subordinated to men in the United States in the past, and they are subordinated in other countries today, but they have full legal, social, and economic equality in the contemporary United States.

  • Rowan agrees with the statement.
  • Zoe disagrees with the statement.

My name is Guide, and I'm here to support your discussion. If you need anything, start your message with “Hey Guide” 🤓

Rowan

I agreed with this statement because women were very much subordinate to men in the past, and in some countries, if not most, still are. But women in the United States do have that privilege of being in some aspects equal to men.

a few days later

Zoe

Hello, I chose the slightly disagree option because while I do agree women have a larger range of equality in the contemporary United States, men are still socially and economically superior due to the previous subordination women faced.

Rowan

I see your point, and I won't deny that there is a gender hierarchy in a lot of aspects, but for the most part, women, especially in the united states have a lot of privileges.

Guide

Rowan, when you say women have "a lot of privileges" in the United States, what specific legal, social, or economic areas are you thinking of? And how do you square that with Zoe's point about men being "socially and economically superior"?

It seems like you two might actually agree more than you initially think — you both acknowledge some form of gender hierarchy exists. The key question is whether that hierarchy is significant enough to contradict the claim of "full equality."

What would "full equality" actually require?

Rowan

Women now in this day in age are able to buy their own home, to get their education, and in some jobs earn the same wage as men. That is where the men are economically superior because most of the time they will earn more money than women.

Rowan

As before, women would need to rely on a man for everything. But now women are able to do things without them, not needing to rely on them for support.

Zoe

I agree with that statement. Women do have more opportunities now and they are able to be independent

Zoe

I think the word “full” isn’t accurate to describe the equality of men and women. Full equality would entail women and men being entirely and completely viewed as the same. No “but this” or “but that”.

Rowan

i see your point, women aren't being entirely and completely viewed as the same, can you tell me more about that

Zoe

Certainly, I think there’s a certain level of respect for women now, more than before I can say confidently. However, that respect will never surpass the respect men receive. Men will consistently be viewed as the “greater” being simply for being a man.

Zoe

I’d love to hear more about the privileges you believe women have in the US!

Rowan

Of course, I feel like the gender hierarchy has been very prominent back in the day, even between races. White women having more power than poc men and women, then it kind of filtered out to just men having hierarchy over women in general. But now I feel like woman are changing that hierarchy no matter their race, which is why they have more privilege. But this can differ between social classes, because this has been a big problem within our society, especially in this day and age.

Zoe

I completely agree with you. I definitely do think that women now across all races are breaking many stereotypes and propelling the fact that women can be and are just as strong as men in every aspect of life

Guide

Zoe, you just said men will "consistently be viewed as the 'greater' being simply for being a man." But now you're saying women are "just as strong as men in every aspect of life."

How do you reconcile those two claims? Can women be viewed as equal in strength/capability while simultaneously being seen as lesser?

Zoe

Absolutely. I believe that strength is subjective to the eye of the beholder. To me women are just as strong as men, to others they are not. When it comes down to it, if a man cannot do a job but a woman does it instead she will have proven that she is equally capable however, because she is a woman she will not be given the praise for it

Rowan

Women have come so far in social status, and they are able to show that they are, if not better than, men in a lot of aspects that were male-dominated. I think we as a society should hold value to that, but of course, women are always shadowed by men, but that doesn't mean they are less equal to men. It's something that society should be able to fix, and overall get past the idea that women are always lower than men.

Zoe

I agree. I don’t believe women are less equal to men, but societally women will always be inferior. It’s a harmful concept that refuses to go away

Guide

Rowan, you say women being "shadowed by men" doesn't mean they're "less equal" — but how can there be "full equality" if women consistently receive less recognition and praise for the same accomplishments?

You both seem to agree that women face systematic undervaluation despite equal capability. Doesn't that directly challenge the statement's claim about "full social and economic equality"?

Rowan

That's true, women are almost always being shadowed, but that doesn't necessarily make them less equal, it just means society needs to fix its perception of the way women are perceived.

Zoe

I agree. In actuality they are not less equal, they are just viewed as such. I understand your perspective

Rowan

If we are talking about having full legal, social, and economic equality, then I believe women and men are equal in those aspects, but socially, there does seem to be a bit of tension in that area.

Guide

Rowan, you just said women and men are equal "in those aspects" but then immediately said "socially, there does seem to be a bit of tension."

Social equality was one of the three areas listed. So are women socially equal to men or not?

And if society systematically undervalues women's accomplishments — as you both seem to agree — how is that not a form of social inequality?

Rowan

Socially, as in how society views men and women in the hierarchy that they have built. But legal social and economic equality they are equal.

Rowan

Zoe, I think we both see each other's points and agree with each other. You made some really great points in this discussion.

Zoe

Thank you Rowan I feel that you have also made some very important and interesting points throughout this discussion. I’m happy we are able to agree and disagree at the same time. It allows me to explore different perspectives❤️

Rowan

I think that is what our society needs to see: that you are able to agree and disagree at the same time. Which is why I really enjoy reading the professor's book, especially the chapter where they talk about gender neutral restrooms. At the end of the day, everyone wants accessible, safe, and private restrooms, but it's difficult to understand that when everyone just likes to argue and be the correct ones.

Guide

Zoe, Rowan just brought up gender-neutral restrooms from the reading. The authors argue that despite disagreement, people share common ground on wanting safe, accessible, private restrooms.

Do you see a parallel between that example and your discussion here? You both seem to agree women face systematic undervaluation, but you're disagreeing about whether that counts as inequality.

Is this a substantive disagreement, or are you just using "equality" differently?

Zoe

I think we might be using equality in this context a little differently but the message is the same

Zoe

I agree Rowan, it’s hard to get others to understand different perspectives sometimes but that’s what society needs.

Rowan

How are you using equality Zoe? I'm using it and seeing it as legally we are all equal, though in some social cases it might not seem like it. But under the law, we are equal.

Zoe

I understand the legally equal. I think I’m using it on more of a morally equal way

Guide

Rowan, if women are legally equal but systematically undervalued socially — which you both agree happens — does the original statement's claim of "full social equality" hold up?

The statement didn't just say "legal equality." It said women have achieved full equality in all three areas: legal, social, and economic.

Rowan

Women are mostly equal legally and economically, but socially, there are still a lot of areas where women are not yet socially equal. I can agree to that.

Zoe

I’ve appreciated this conversation Rowan. I feel glad to have been able to share opinions with you

Rowan

I think this discussion really helps us make good points on the topic and come to the conclusion that we both agree on. The sway guide also really helped us get into depth in our conversation, and even led me to thoughts I haven't even thought about yet for my argument. I realized a lot of things about women's rights, and I hope to learn more from others through this Sway chat and maybe also agree with others on here.👍

Zoe

I agree. The sway guide was a really helpful tool to help us keep our conversation going.

02Understanding quiz

Sway asks each student five questions about what their partner argued. These are the answers they gave.

Zoedisagrees

Understanding Quiz

5 questions about what Rowan argued.

Which of the following did Rowan cite as evidence that women have economic privileges in the United States?
  • That women have higher voting rates, greater representation in government, and more leadership roles.
  • That women are legally protected from harassment, have equal parental leave, and access to healthcare.
  • That women can buy their own home, get their education, and in some jobs earn the same wage as men.
  • That women face a wider range of academic fields and broader career options than men.

correct

When you pointed out that men are still socially and economically superior, how did Rowan respond?
  • By denying any remaining hierarchy and insisting women and men are completely equal in every respect.
  • By acknowledging the gender hierarchy but emphasizing that women still hold many privileges in the US.
  • By shifting the discussion to inequalities in other countries instead of focusing on the US.
  • By arguing that men's superiority remains mainly in legal rights, not in social or economic areas.

correct

Over the course of the discussion, how did Rowan modify his stance on social equality?
  • He began by denying any social inequality and ended up denying legal equality as well.
  • He consistently maintained throughout that social hierarchy does not affect equality.
  • He shifted his focus from legal rights to highlighting biological differences between men and women.
  • He initially claimed full social equality but later conceded that social perceptions still create tension.

correct

Why does Rowan argue that women being "shadowed by men" does not mean they are less equal?
  • Because he believes being shadowed clearly shows women are inherently inferior.
  • Because he assumes social recognition will improve on its own without any action.
  • Because he views equality primarily in terms of legal and economic status rather than social recognition.
  • Because he thinks women's economic independence automatically guarantees social equality.

correct

How did Guide challenge Rowan's reasoning about "full equality"?
  • By asking him to list specific examples of privileges he thinks women have in the US.
  • By pointing out the contradiction between claiming full legal, social, and economic equality and admitting persistent social tension.
  • By critiquing his use of the word "privilege" as too broad and unspecific.
  • By asking Zoe to explain her definition of equality in moral terms.

correct

5 of 5 correct Next

Rowanagrees

Understanding Quiz

5 questions about what Zoe argued.

At the start of the discussion, why did Zoe argue that women in the contemporary United States do not have full equality?
  • She claimed women lack basic legal rights such as voting and property ownership.
  • She argued that men remain socially and economically superior because of historical subordination of women.
  • She stated that women have fewer educational opportunities than men.
  • She insisted that women were still entirely dependent on men for financial support.

correct

At one point, Zoe suggested that the term 'full equality' was inaccurate. According to her, what would 'full equality' require?
  • Equal legal status but not necessarily equal social recognition.
  • Men and women to be entirely and completely viewed as the same, without any 'but this' or 'but that'.
  • Women to have more rights than men in certain contexts to compensate for past subordination.
  • Creating separate but equal spaces for men and women.

correct

When challenged about her claim that women are as strong as men but still undervalued, how did Zoe explain this apparent contradiction?
  • She said the law prevents women from receiving recognition in male-dominated jobs.
  • She argued that strength is objective and identical for men and women.
  • She stated that perceptions of strength are subjective and that societal bias prevents women from getting praise even when they perform...
  • She claimed that women choose not to be praised for their achievements due to modesty.

correct

Toward the end, Zoe remarked that you and she might be "using 'equality' in this context a little differently." How did she specify her own usage of 'equality'?
  • She was focusing on legal equality as enshrined in law.
  • She was emphasizing economic equality in terms of income and job opportunities.
  • She meant moral equality-being valued equally by society.
  • She was referring to social equality in everyday interactions.

correct

What main point did Guide emphasize by repeatedly questioning the distinction between legal, social, and economic equality?
  • That gender-neutral restrooms are key to achieving equality.
  • That without full social recognition, legal and economic equality is incomplete.
  • That historical context is more important than current inequalities.
  • That education rights are the primary measure of gender equality.

correct

5 of 5 correct Next

03Post-chat survey

Last, both students rate the statement again and then rate a randomly sampled subset of our post-chat survey items. Like their transcripts, individual student opinions are never revealed to instructors.

Zoedisagrees

Now you’ve had a chance to discuss the topic, rate your level of agreement with the original statement again.

Remember, all responses to Sway surveys are private and never shown to your instructor.

Women were subordinated to men in the United States in the past, and they are subordinated in other countries today, but they have full legal, social, and economic equality in the contemporary United States.

Strongly disagreeModerately disagreeSlightly disagreeNo ideaSlightly agreeModerately agreeStrongly agree

How much do you agree with each of these?

StatementStrongly DisagreeDisagreeNeutralAgreeStrongly Agree
Guide's contributions improved the discussion
Guide supported both sides of the discussion equally
My partner was genuinely trying to understand my perspective
It was valuable to chat with a student who did NOT share my perspective
It would be good if more students and classes used Sway
Sway helped me articulate my thoughts/feelings better
Submit

Rowanagrees

Now you’ve had a chance to discuss the topic, rate your level of agreement with the original statement again.

Remember, all responses to Sway surveys are private and never shown to your instructor.

Women were subordinated to men in the United States in the past, and they are subordinated in other countries today, but they have full legal, social, and economic equality in the contemporary United States.

Strongly disagreeModerately disagreeSlightly disagreeNo ideaSlightly agreeModerately agreeStrongly agree

How much do you agree with each of these?

StatementStrongly DisagreeDisagreeNeutralAgreeStrongly Agree
Guide's contributions improved the discussion
Guide treated me and my partner with equal respect
Guide supported both sides of the discussion equally
I felt comfortable sharing my honest opinions with my partner
I was not offended by my partner's perspective
It was valuable to chat with a student who did NOT share my perspective
Submit

Opinion change

Zoedisagrees

+1

Rowanagrees

-2

before the chat after the chat Seven points, from strongly disagree to strongly agree. Both students rated the statement before the chat and again after the quiz.

Up next